Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Time: A Catalyst for Change in the Religious World of the Human Individual


Exploring the role of religion in America from the 1800’s through today’s day in age surely highlights a dramatic change in organized religion and tradition within the church. A once focused structural core of religion centered around uniform expectations and specific beliefs in a Christian upbringing has surely delved into a liberating freedom in which the individual has the ability to break away from the uniform upbringing passed down from generation to generation to explore new philosophies in which the amount of possibilities are limitless. Ultimately, religion has progressed from a limited utilitarian individualistic perspective breaking away from tradition instead moving towards an expressive individualistic standpoint in life today.

            From 1964 onward, after the promotion of civic rights and the push for equal opportunities for all, a massive movement was seen throughout American society pushing for the need to find oneself. A hippie sub-movement emerged in which the art of love was drastically being pushed for versus the dangerous world of war surrounding the individual. America was entering a phase in which the need to find the independent, autonomous self was greatly being explored. Americans born into the traditional organized groups of religion and moral uniform expectations were branching out and going on their own way delving into the dangerous and competitive world around. Americans would  learn who they truly were and what they indeed wanted to do with their life choosing which of the mores they would continue to carry and withhold or drastically avoid from the family values they once grew up with. As Robert Bellah once described, the traditional art of religion was not being withheld as seen in the changing world around the hippie movement: “For religion to have emphasized the public order in the old sense of deference and obedience to external authorities would no longer have made sense. Religion did not cease to be concerned with moral order, but it operated with a new emphasis on the individual and the voluntary association. Moral teaching came to emphasize self-control rather than deference. It prepared the individual to maintain self-respect and establish ethical commitments in a dangerous and competitive world, not to fit into the stable harmony of an organic community” (222). Instead, religion in the 1900’s was changing with the individual and the perspective outlook on that time period in which they now lived varying greatly from the days of Tocqueville in the 1800’s.
Picture: A picture from the Hippie Movement of the 1960's representing the important individualistic perspectives of Americans at the time to live a life full of love versus the war in the world around them.

            Tocqueville’s chronicles analyzing observations through religion and politics expressed a major difference in religion from the 1800’s to what now exists today. According to Bellah,“Tocqueville saw religion primarily as a powerful influence on individual character and action. Religions political function was not direct intervention but instead rather support of the mores that make democracy possible. In particular, it had the role of placing limits on utilitarian individualism, hedging in self-interest with proper concern for others. The “main business” of religion, Tocqueville said, “is to purify, control, and restrain that excessive and exclusive taste for well-being” so common among Americans” (223). Tocqueville expressed religion to be based upon a limited utilitarian individualistic perspective in which one would do the best they could on their own to do what was in the best interest of themself and their family, while simultaneously following the “Golden Rule” in which they would treat others how they would want to be treated in return. Americans were focusing on being pure and moral within their actions versus upholding doctrines expressed by the Pope and bishops in the world around them. Instead the people were focusing on their families and the support groups of local organized church communities in which they could express morality and show themselves living a pure lifestyle within the community. Emerging into the 1900’s the rational following of doctrines within these church communities was being converted into a new evangelical perspective in which people were focusing on their beliefs on their own and branching away from the traditional church towards like-minded support groups in which one could show their own expressive individualistic thoughts.
          Expressive individualistic perspectives most commonly seen today have resulted in accordance to the individual’s needs. The individual has always needed care and a sympathy or support group from others emphasizing the need for self-control, self-respect, and morals one needs to live by to ultimately be happy. However, when those organic communities of traditional religion no longer offered the warm and fuzzy feelings of empathy and support the individual needed, breaking away from the church soon resulted. These breakaways ultimately lead to the commonality of expressive individualism we have today and the formation of the new lifestyle-enclaves. These enclaves are full of people branching away from organized religion who have like-minded thoughts and want to establish ethical commitments in which they do not have to belong to a certain denomination and follow the doctrinal beliefs traditionally bestowed upon them. Instead, the human being today has become much happier attending non-denominational church groups in which they can believe what they want freely and do as they please in a support group of like-minded people centered around no expectations other than an overall self-governing belief in God.

Picture: An example of a non-denominational church now existing today in which many people have turned to. 

No comments:

Post a Comment